Technical audit
Independent review of architecture, performance, security, data, and engineering processes.
- risk and technical-debt map
- prioritized remediation plan
- architecture and team recommendations
qdev.run — four engagement models: audit, delivery, data, and operations
We do not sell abstract development hours. We first define the problem, risks, engagement model, and expected artifacts, then deliver in short, verifiable cycles.
Delivery team
A dedicated senior engineering team for a service launch, migration, integration, portal, mobile app, or data platform.
- architecture and delivery
- weekly demos and reviews
- code, documentation, and context transfer
Data and AI platforms
Sources, processing, search, RAG, models, and quality controls in one managed system.
- data model and quality
- verifiable search and answers
- latency and cost controls
Operations support
Support for a live product: observability, incidents, performance, security, and architecture evolution.
- monitoring and incident review
- regular architecture review
- planned improvements without business interruption
process
Work is organized around decisions, not formal reporting
Every stage ends with a verifiable artifact: a decision, code, diagram, test, infrastructure configuration, or operational instruction.
| stage | what happens | outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Discovery | Clarify business constraints, current architecture, risks, users, and system dependencies. | Problem map and success criteria. |
| Architecture | Define system boundaries, data, contracts, access roles, infrastructure, and the delivery plan. | Architecture plan and decision backlog. |
| Delivery | Deliver in short cycles, hand over working output, and document key decisions. | Working product, tests, and documentation. |
| Operations | Configure deployment, monitoring, alerts, backup, and support procedures. | The system is ready for operation. |